Subject	Out of curiosity, why would it decrease performance? (n/m)
Posted by	DougG on April 01, 2005 at 2:12 PM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	Only if you want a performance decrease. (n/m) posted by Kenny on April 01, 2005 at 11:05 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Need help regarding 3" test pipes - kmahmood 10:56:19 04/01/05 Not really any reason to do that. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:03:05 04/01/05 I was getting a good deal on cat back exhaust with - kmahmood 11:10:24 04/01/05 Only if you want a performance decrease. (n/m) - Kenny 11:05:56 04/01/05 Out of curiosity, why would it decrease performance? (n/m) - DougG 14:12:13 04/01/05 Short answer, more backpressure. (n/m) - turtleboy 14:55:26 04/01/05 How would increasing the diameter of the pipe create more - myzislow 17:01:28 04/01/05 Welcome to thermodynamics. - Kenny 17:25:40 04/01/05 It decreases the exhaust gas velocity. - Kenny 16:34:59 04/01/05 Interesting. Thank you for the breakdown. So, it is not - DougG 19:05:32 04/01/05 I believe the two preceeding posts are tryign to tell you - Seafordguy 11:11:02 04/01/05 I'm with this guy. (n/m) - Kenny 11:19:57 04/01/05 post your dyno's then? (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:39:54 04/02/05 Who put a question mark at the end of the prompter? (n/m) - Kenny 22:59:57 04/02/05 Speaking in 3rd persons, lol. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 21:00:00 04/03/05 I disagree, I felt a power INCREASE going from 2.5" - shawn300zTT GT28R soon 14:32:20 04/01/05 Bigger = cooler and slower - turtleboy 14:55:01 04/01/05 Have you *dynoed*, or just *felt* a difference? - Dallas DamonZ 17:28:29 04/01/05 BS, do some searching yourself :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:39:07 04/02/05 2.5", 3" are HARD to argue to be MUCH different. Given - Scotts94z32 12:05:49 04/01/05 a 3 inch exhaust from the cat back will not create a - Slowninja(GT28RS Inconel Z) 20:17:18 04/01/05 and your not going to see one - ZBlacktt 01:37:54 04/02/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.